Re: [pcp] signal pmlogger

[Martins Innus <minnus@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Nathan,

On 4/15/14 1:56 AM, Nathan Scott wrote:
> >   
> >
> > And in the mean time we should consider the discussion to see if we can
> > refine 1. into something that is general useful, robust and easy to use.
> I like the direction #1 is headed also.
>
> I wonder if a concept of groups of metrics would be useful here (IOW, user
> defined, named groups) - so not only the one additional set.  There may be
> different problem scenarios that someone is trying to focus on, problem A
> might want to catch a set of proc metrics, problem B maybe some mem state,
> problem C a third set ... switching on/off these groups via pmlc commands
> that pmie could latch onto simply via "enable setB, interval X", "disable
> setB" and so on, could be quite neat.
Yeah, multiple named groups would be great.

Martins