| To: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates - pmlogmv |
| From: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 01 Apr 2014 09:06:35 +1100 |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1475108664.2474156.1395914867126.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <5333E8B1.1020208@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1475108664.2474156.1395914867126.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 |
On 27/03/14 21:07, Nathan Scott wrote: ... BTW, doesn't this seem more like a PCP_BINADM_DIR utility than a PCP_BIN_DIR one ... ? Probably noone will ever need to run it "by hand" from the command line, which is the litmus test I have tended to go by in the past. Well I actually _do_ run this by hand.In one pmlogger farm I have passing pastoral care for, there are currently 5,000 pcp archives from 55 hosts. Things do not go wrong that often, but when something goes wrong I may have to juggle a _lot_ of archives. In at least on case in the past, pmlogmv would have saved me accidentally destroying months of archive data! I will definitely use it from the command line ... and more often than I'd run pmlogger from the command line, and pmlogger is currently installed in the same /usr/bin as pmlogmv. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | pcp updates - qa/738 ... grr, Ken McDonell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates - pmlogmv, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates - pmlogmv, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates - pmlogmv, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |