pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] python qa failures

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] python qa failures
From: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 15:06:53 +1100
Cc: PCP Mailing List <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1041086392.1809515.1395212141704.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <53293D8D.5030803@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1041086392.1809515.1395212141704.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
On 19/03/14 17:55, Nathan Scott wrote:
...
$ cat eek.py
#!/usr/bin/python
import curses
$ ./eek.py
$ rpm -qa | grep curses | grep python
python-curses-2.6.8-0.15.1
cat /etc/SuSE-release
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 (x86_64)
VERSION = 11
PATCHLEVEL = 1


Thanks ... I was confused because that recipe did not work on Fedora 18, but the python module is installed there.

This seems to be a place where the rpm packaging has diverged across the distros.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>