pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] datetime enhancements

To: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [pcp] datetime enhancements
From: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 06:59:03 +1100
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <y0mbny3owuy.fsf@xxxxxxxx>
References: <53042BF5.5070704@xxxxxxxxxx> <y0mbny3owuy.fsf@xxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
On 20/02/14 04:06, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:

scox wrote:

QA output created by 751
"start "                       2014-02-17 10:08:50
"end   "                       2014-02-27 11:28:50
[...]
"+1minute"                     2014-02-17 10:09:50
"-1minute"                     2014-02-27 11:27:50
[...]

Where does the logic come in that additive or subtractive
time intevals would need to be relative to the (archive?)
start/end times vs. the actual current time?

It has always been so when the context is an archive ... Stan's output is from a formative QA test where an archive context is the only thing that is deterministic.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>