pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] PCP 3.9.0 install problems

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] PCP 3.9.0 install problems
From: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 09:00:02 +1100
Cc: PCP Mailing List <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <2061782363.8279608.1392631902639.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <5301AE27.10007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1027442162.8195023.1392625260273.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <003e01cf2bc0$5430c030$fc924090$@internode.on.net> <2061782363.8279608.1392631902639.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
On 17/02/14 21:11, Nathan Scott wrote:
...
These last few are quite interesting - they'd seem to be proving ineffective
in your case.  No idea where they came from, I don't remember adding 'em in
with the original perl packaging work (but, twas back years now).

Digging a little deeper it is the creation, not the removal that is a difference between an failing and OK debian packaging run.

The lines like ..

Appending installation info to /home/kenj/src/pcp/build/deb/pcp-3.9.0/debian/libpcp-mmv-perl/usr/lib/perl/5.14/perllocal.pod

are not in the good build.

These lines come from the generated Perl Makefiles in both cases ... but the Makefiles are not the same and "make -f Makefile install" produces different output in the two cases.

I'll try pure_install instead of install later.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>