| To: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] PCP 3.9.0 install problems |
| From: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 18 Feb 2014 09:00:02 +1100 |
| Cc: | PCP Mailing List <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <2061782363.8279608.1392631902639.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <5301AE27.10007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1027442162.8195023.1392625260273.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <003e01cf2bc0$5430c030$fc924090$@internode.on.net> <2061782363.8279608.1392631902639.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 |
On 17/02/14 21:11, Nathan Scott wrote: ... These last few are quite interesting - they'd seem to be proving ineffective in your case. No idea where they came from, I don't remember adding 'em in with the original perl packaging work (but, twas back years now). Digging a little deeper it is the creation, not the removal that is a difference between an failing and OK debian packaging run. The lines like ..Appending installation info to /home/kenj/src/pcp/build/deb/pcp-3.9.0/debian/libpcp-mmv-perl/usr/lib/perl/5.14/perllocal.pod are not in the good build.These lines come from the generated Perl Makefiles in both cases ... but the Makefiles are not the same and "make -f Makefile install" produces different output in the two cases. I'll try pure_install instead of install later. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates - mostly pmie, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | pcp updates: fche, kenj, nathans merges - pmmgr, pmie, qa, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] PCP 3.9.0 install problems, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | pcp updates - mostly pmie, Ken McDonell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |