pcp
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [pcp] pcp updates: packaging

from [Mark Goodwin] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [pcp] pcp updates: packaging
From: Mark Goodwin <mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 13:45:38 +1100
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <785821202.46992636.1389232004456.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <785821202.46992636.1389232004456.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 
On 01/09/2014 12:46 PM, Nathan Scott wrote:

     Another tilt at the NeedRebuild saga - this is a temp flag file, which
     will be removed, as such it should not be in the RPM package filelist.


just a nit: should it still be present but prefixed with a %ghost directive?
e.g. so rpm -e will correctly erase it? (and to keep rpmlint happy too).
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  pcp updates: packaging, Nathan Scott
Next by Date:  Re: [pcp] pcp updates: packaging, Nathan Scott
Previous by Thread:  pcp updates: packaging, Nathan Scott
Next by Thread:  Re: [pcp] pcp updates: packaging, Nathan Scott
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]