| To: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates - more permissions tweaking |
| From: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 25 Jul 2013 20:02:17 +1000 |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1593471553.2196672.1374738878798.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <51F0732C.30009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <223462914.2084329.1374715690313.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> <51F09C7D.60803@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1460669148.2111101.1374723487371.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> <325880646.2112699.1374723770415.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> <51F0B3C3.9030207@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1593471553.2196672.1374738878798.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7 |
BTW, an interesting side note - test 994 passes when run on a freshly installed package, but fails after a complete QA run. Pretty sure this is because somewhere along the line (in the hundreds of preceding tests), the pmlogger control file is being moved aside then put back, and permissions of pcpqa:pcpqa end up stuck on it. Ugh. Yep, I've found some of these already ... not too concerned, we can smack 'em as we come across them. The really important thing is to check 994 passes after a new install/upgrade. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Authentication HOWTO, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | pcp updates - qa/366, Ken McDonell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates - more permissions tweaking, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | pmlogger versus unix domain sockets, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |