pcp
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [pcp] pmlogger performance

from [Stan Cox] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [pcp] pmlogger performance
From: Stan Cox <scox@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 21:54:38 -0400
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <51E4A12C.5000003@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <51E374C4.5@xxxxxxxxxx> <51E4A12C.5000003@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130311 Thunderbird/17.0.4 

I am retooling the performance checking to:

1. Run the benchmark on all cpus for given length of time,
2. Then run 1. + pmlogger,
3. Then run 1. + tool, e.g. sar,
4. Run steps 2 and 3 for multiple runs varying interval (10s, 1m, 10m?) and length of run 
5. graph and/or simplify the results
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [pcp] pmlogger performance, Ken McDonell
Next by Date:  Re: [pcp] pmlogger performance, Ken McDonell
Previous by Thread:  Re: [pcp] pmlogger performance, Ken McDonell
Next by Thread:  Re: [pcp] pmlogger performance, Ken McDonell
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]