| To: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] Checking PCP archives - RFC |
| From: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 22 May 2013 10:09:50 +1000 |
| Cc: | PCP Mailing List <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <230016256.8782810.1369180770282.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <519AC94B.9020904@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <141842009.8767308.1369177350957.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> <519C08C0.7000600@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <230016256.8782810.1369180770282.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6 |
On 22/05/13 09:59, Nathan Scott wrote: src/pmlogsummary/pmlogcheck.c man/man1/pmlogcheck.1 Oh! and thanks!I have no recollection of this ... and the git history does not reach back into the SGI source repository, so I can't even use p_blame. I need to go off and study this code and see how much overlap there is. But it appears to be using pmFetchArchive() which is only going to work after passing the earlier passes proposed for (the new, and now name conflicted) pmlogcheck. First reaction would be that the "new" pmlogcheck" would be a superset of, and replace, the existing tool of the same name. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Checking PCP archives - RFC, Ken McDonell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] Checking PCP archives - RFC, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] Checking PCP archives - RFC, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] Checking PCP archives - RFC, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |