| To: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] QA status - warning |
| From: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 08 May 2013 10:33:25 +1000 |
| Cc: | PCP Mailing List <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <86805787.12576575.1367970791260.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <51823EB3.1030003@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <410335498.9468044.1367544497012.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> <851894341.11621320.1367881806756.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> <2055430036.11651048.1367887214801.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> <51889F39.8060206@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <86805787.12576575.1367970791260.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130329 Thunderbird/17.0.5 |
On 08/05/13 09:53, Nathan Scott wrote: No problem. I wonder if the pmdammv Install script should strive for a DSO installation by default, since thats what the build/packaging does? (not sure if that is possible with pmdaproc.sh though) I considered that, but a quick look at pmdaproc.sh convinced me to walk away quietly and slowly. So with all the latest commits from my tree and the oss.sgi.com dev tree, I'm still seeing these failures: 024 051 359 367 371 374 375 513 532 652 on this host vm03 3.8.0 x86_64 Fedora 18 (Spherical Cow) I won't get much of chance to investigate further today I'm afraid. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | pcp updates - build/configure issues, Ken McDonell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] QA status - warning, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] QA status - warning, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] QA status - warning, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |