| To: | markgw@xxxxxxx, pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx, anibal@xxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: pcp updates |
| From: | nscott@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Wed, 5 Mar 2008 21:14:46 +1100 (EST) |
| Importance: | Normal |
| In-reply-to: | <49977.192.168.3.1.1204711129.squirrel@mail.aconex.com> |
| References: | <47851.192.168.3.1.1204709786.squirrel@mail.aconex.com> <47CE6C3C.1010901@sgi.com> <49977.192.168.3.1.1204711129.squirrel@mail.aconex.com> |
| Sender: | pcp-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | SquirrelMail/1.4.8-4.el4.centos |
> So I guess this is the right place. Maybe Anibal can give us some more > insights here though? I just came across Postgres and Postfix, which have their own /usr/lib/foo binary hideout ... so 2 out of a few hundred ... thats good enough for me!; I'll copy that precedent until/unless Anibal has strong opinions. :) Thanks! -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: pcp updates, nscott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | pcp updates, nscott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: pcp updates, nscott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: pcp updates, Max Matveev |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |