| To: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] Build/install status for 3.7.0 |
| From: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 07 Mar 2013 14:44:56 +1100 |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1198532005.15945263.1362605295516.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1198532005.15945263.1362605295516.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130221 Thunderbird/17.0.3 |
I have a Windows 8 VM there with a pre-release developer licence (that may or may not still work), but the biggest obstacle is there is no reliable recipe for creating a build environment with MSYS et al to create installable packages.In the interim, to catch dev branch build fallout early on (before a release), could a git-based (update/clone + build + raw make install) kind of model be utilised? (horrible, I know) git is not the problem.The issue is I have no clue what pieces of MinGW/MSYS need to be installed where and in what order to get an "official" or even "sane" build environment. I have something on _another_ Windows box that sort of works but the build takes many hours. If I'm going to do this I need a "create the Windows build environment" recipe so I have something that is at least reproducible ... but that recipe does not seem to exist anywhere. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] Build/install status for 3.7.0, Ken McDonell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] Build/install status for 3.7.0, Ken McDonell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] Build/install status for 3.7.0, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Next PCP developers meeting (was Re: [pcp] Build/install status for 3.7.0), Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |