| To: | "Martin Hicks" <mort@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: PMAPI for something other than C? |
| From: | nscott@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Wed, 28 May 2008 08:11:34 +1000 (EST) |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Importance: | Normal |
| In-reply-to: | <20080527180057.GC25468@laplace.bork.org> |
| References: | <20080527180057.GC25468@laplace.bork.org> |
| Sender: | pcp-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | SquirrelMail/1.4.8-4.el4.centos |
Hi Martin, > Are there PMAPI bindings for languages other than C? I see the PMDA API > for perl in src/cpan, but it doesn't look like the PMAPI is in there. There are no other bindings. The pmResult structure is relatively complex (compact) and doesn't lend itself to translation to other languages (at least, it was well beyond my C -> Perl translation abilities). Whenever I think of tackling this, I always reach the point of thinking the PMAPI is the wrong place to add a binding - a higher level API would be better. Maybe PMC based, or maybe a tool like pmie should be refactored to provide an API. But, I always just end up using tools like pmdumptext, pmie, pmprobe, pminfo, etc from within scripts. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | PMAPI for something other than C?, Martin Hicks |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: PMAPI for something other than C?, Martin Hicks |
| Previous by Thread: | PMAPI for something other than C?, Martin Hicks |
| Next by Thread: | Re: PMAPI for something other than C?, Martin Hicks |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |