pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] pcp updates - last piece of debian packaging changes for this

To: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] pcp updates - last piece of debian packaging changes for this round
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 20:40:42 -0500 (EST)
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <530FDAE6.5070308@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <530F9B64.4080505@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <722030351.18148411.1393537152651.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <530FDAE6.5070308@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: 85zsoG6OuVtP8v6oeVsKanJL6je6cQ==
Thread-topic: pcp updates - last piece of debian packaging changes for this round

----- Original Message -----
> > Are these distros without microhttpd really current? ...
> 
> Yes ... MOST of the debian-derived ones in my QA farm ... sigh.
> [...]
> Er, no. Not that I can see from using the official package repositories.

I don't "get" how this can be, unless these distros are actively removing
packages (which defeats alot of the point of using debian/ubuntu); a search
on packages.debian.org shows all stable releases (even "oldstable" - now
many many years old), have *some* form of libmicrohttpd ...
https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=libmicrohttpd&searchon=names&suite=oldstable&section=all
https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=libmicrohttpd&searchon=names&suite=stable&section=all

So, how can this be possible?  It doesn't make sense that they would remove
packages like this - perhaps there is a "libdevel" section elsewhere for
these distributions thats not in the default /etc/apt/sources.list?  The
current "stable" Debian release has the needed bits, and Debian has always
been notoriously slow between stable releases.

Perhaps we are testing the lunatic fringe a bit here - are there any Ubuntu
or Debian releases in the QA farm that lack needed support?  AFAICT, there
should not be any.

cheers.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>