----- Original Message -----
> > Are these distros without microhttpd really current? ...
>
> Yes ... MOST of the debian-derived ones in my QA farm ... sigh.
> [...]
> Er, no. Not that I can see from using the official package repositories.
I don't "get" how this can be, unless these distros are actively removing
packages (which defeats alot of the point of using debian/ubuntu); a search
on packages.debian.org shows all stable releases (even "oldstable" - now
many many years old), have *some* form of libmicrohttpd ...
https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=libmicrohttpd&searchon=names&suite=oldstable§ion=all
https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=libmicrohttpd&searchon=names&suite=stable§ion=all
So, how can this be possible? It doesn't make sense that they would remove
packages like this - perhaps there is a "libdevel" section elsewhere for
these distributions thats not in the default /etc/apt/sources.list? The
current "stable" Debian release has the needed bits, and Debian has always
been notoriously slow between stable releases.
Perhaps we are testing the lunatic fringe a bit here - are there any Ubuntu
or Debian releases in the QA farm that lack needed support? AFAICT, there
should not be any.
cheers.
--
Nathan
|