| To: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx, "kenj >> Ken McDonell" <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates - thread-safe libpcp is done! |
| From: | Mark Goodwin <mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:32:44 +1000 |
| In-reply-to: | <1311389057.20414.22.camel@bozo-laptop> |
| References: | <1311389057.20414.22.camel@bozo-laptop> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110621 Fedora/3.1.11-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.11 |
On 07/23/2011 12:44 PM, Ken McDonell wrote: 3. Max, there was an issue raised at the meeting held at the Aconex offices about context vs channel locking, but my notes don't capture enough detail to reconstruct your concerns. The locking currently works like this IIRC, we discussed whether we still want to keep using multiple contexts per socket/channel connection to the same pmcd, or whether to change that to a 1:1 arrangement to simplify the locking. The current n:1 implementation was only really used for the old pmchart, which is now long gone. [The discussion then went on to annoying pmns traversal latency in the new pmchart metric selector, and someone suggested downloading and caching the pmns in each client to avoid this .. something like that] Cheers -- Mark |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | pcpqa updates, Ken McDonell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates - thread-safe libpcp is done!, Ken McDonell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates - thread-safe libpcp is done!, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates - thread-safe libpcp is done!, Ken McDonell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |