| To: | kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] [addendum] Possible problem with event record mechanisms |
| From: | David Smith <dsmith@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:35:15 -0500 |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1300219622.9332.5.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1065670774.114691299755917880.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1299787346.28719.22.camel@bozo-laptop> <1300219622.9332.5.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110307 Fedora/3.1.9-0.39.b3pre.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.9 |
On 03/15/2011 03:07 PM, Ken McDonell wrote: > On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 07:02 +1100, Ken McDonell wrote: >> OK there seems to be consensus ... I'll make the changes to support >> instance domains for event records. > > This is now done in the latest round of commits to my pcp4 branch. Hmm, when I use the pcp4 branch, I'm getting some odd results. pminfo reports that sample.event.records exists, but both pmval and pmevent report a PM_ERR_PMID (Unknown or illegal metric identifier) when I try to read its value. Got any ideas on where I should look for the problem? -- David Smith dsmith@xxxxxxxxxx Red Hat http://www.redhat.com 256.217.0141 (direct) 256.837.0057 (fax) |
| Previous by Date: | I27 PRE VENTA EN EXCELENTE LUGAR, Blanco Encala 3347, Desde u$s 1.680 el m2, La Capitana2 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | PCP on HPC focused Podcast, Brock Palen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] [addendum] Possible problem with event record mechanisms, Ken McDonell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] [addendum] Possible problem with event record mechanisms, Ken McDonell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |