pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] PCP question ... leading to pmimport discussion

To: "kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] PCP question ... leading to pmimport discussion
From: Greg Banks <gnb@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 05:51:45 +1000
Cc: "nathans@xxxxxxxxxx" <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>, "pmatousu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <pmatousu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx" <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1279228342.11031.3.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Evostor, Inc.
References: <79179398.209531277247128966.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4C21925E.8010006@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1279228342.11031.3.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817)
Ken McDonell wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 14:49 +1000, Greg Banks wrote:
...
Or even better, a Perl API to generate a PCP archive programmatically, so the user can write their own main loop. I would have used such a thing dozens of times by now if it existed. And while you're at it, perhaps also a fully supported and documented C libpcp API for writing an archive from a C program, instead of having to do horrible things with __pmLogCreate() et al.


Greg, I think these objectives have now been met for both Perl and C.

Please let me know if that is not your view.

They have indeed, thanks very much :)

Greg.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>