Re: [pcp] pcp updates (mort-dev)

[Trevor Hurst <trev@xxxxxxx>]

Mark Goodwin wrote:
> Martin Hicks wrote:
> > I just thought this was wrong.  We have PCP_LIB_DIR as /usr/lib on ia64,
> > but PCP_BINADM_DIR was /usr/lib64/pcp/bin
> >
> > There is nothing else in /usr/lib64 on an ia64 machine, so I assumed
> > this must be wrong.  If this patch is wrong then please enlighten me :)
> > The test looked a lot like an x86 vs. x86_64 arch test that went awry
> > and also caught ia64.
> if there is nothing else in /usr/lib64, then you're probably right
> (I don't have ia64 h/w to investigate).
>
> On x86_64, we have /usr/lib64 containing 64bit binaries
> and /usr/lib containing 32bit binaries. Looks like on ia64
> the native binaries are in /usr/lib, with (presumably) the
> ia32 compat binaries in /usr/lib32?
>
> In any case, I guess ia64 isn't a true multilib arch since
> ia32 is effectively emulated.
>
> - Mark
I think a lot of apps on Itanium use the emulated, is this the same 
thing with PCP? I ran into this issue when we first started migrating 
apps to Itanium with our A350 product line.
-- Trev