pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] pcp updates (mort-dev)

To: Martin Hicks <mort@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] pcp updates (mort-dev)
From: Mark Goodwin <goodwinos@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:24:47 +1100
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20091110231248.GK5895@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20091110183324.GE5895@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4AF9EFD9.1020802@xxxxxxxxx> <20091110231248.GK5895@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090320)
Martin Hicks wrote:
I just thought this was wrong.  We have PCP_LIB_DIR as /usr/lib on ia64,
but PCP_BINADM_DIR was /usr/lib64/pcp/bin

There is nothing else in /usr/lib64 on an ia64 machine, so I assumed
this must be wrong.  If this patch is wrong then please enlighten me :)
The test looked a lot like an x86 vs. x86_64 arch test that went awry
and also caught ia64.


if there is nothing else in /usr/lib64, then you're probably right
(I don't have ia64 h/w to investigate).

On x86_64, we have /usr/lib64 containing 64bit binaries
and /usr/lib containing 32bit binaries. Looks like on ia64
the native binaries are in /usr/lib, with (presumably) the
ia32 compat binaries in /usr/lib32?

In any case, I guess ia64 isn't a true multilib arch since
ia32 is effectively emulated.

- Mark

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>