| To: | Martin Hicks <mort@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates (mort-dev) |
| From: | Mark Goodwin <goodwinos@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:24:47 +1100 |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20091110231248.GK5895@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20091110183324.GE5895@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4AF9EFD9.1020802@xxxxxxxxx> <20091110231248.GK5895@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090320) |
Martin Hicks wrote: I just thought this was wrong. We have PCP_LIB_DIR as /usr/lib on ia64, but PCP_BINADM_DIR was /usr/lib64/pcp/bin There is nothing else in /usr/lib64 on an ia64 machine, so I assumed this must be wrong. If this patch is wrong then please enlighten me :) The test looked a lot like an x86 vs. x86_64 arch test that went awry and also caught ia64. if there is nothing else in /usr/lib64, then you're probably right (I don't have ia64 h/w to investigate). On x86_64, we have /usr/lib64 containing 64bit binaries and /usr/lib containing 32bit binaries. Looks like on ia64 the native binaries are in /usr/lib, with (presumably) the ia32 compat binaries in /usr/lib32? In any case, I guess ia64 isn't a true multilib arch since ia32 is effectively emulated. - Mark |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates (mort-dev), Martin Hicks |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates (mort-dev), Trevor Hurst |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates (mort-dev), Martin Hicks |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates (mort-dev), Trevor Hurst |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |