pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] json pmda qa/1052 failing on Centos6.6

To: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, David Smith <dsmith@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] json pmda qa/1052 failing on Centos6.6
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 03:22:51 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: PCP <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1837540003.4468854.1438736913075.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <017301d0cc28$d7c78640$875692c0$@internode.on.net> <440072288.2807362.1438581950952.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <55BFC26D.8040503@xxxxxxxxxx> <1889100767.3736026.1438652097204.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <55C14FAF.9010100@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <934995702.4411085.1438732642013.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <55C15F12.8060408@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1837540003.4468854.1438736913075.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: UDJqd9HdypzGw/sr5REriIZwr1c85b7fCQFv
Thread-topic: json pmda qa/1052 failing on Centos6.6

----- Original Message -----
> ----- Original Message -----
> > [...]
> > OK ... but if pmdajson is not built for RHEL6, shouldn't this be
> > reflected in the open source PCP configurery for both RHEL6 and
> > CentOS6.6?  If this was the case, then I would not have the failure, I
> > would not spend time trying to debug it and we'd have less email volume?
> 
> Yes, definitely.  I asked the same question below, paragraph #2, but perhaps
> it was misunderstood / overlooked / no-good-answer-exists / ...
> 
>     http://pcp.io/pipermail/pcp/2015-August/007928.html
> 
> Upshot is, I don't know how best to test for it in configure.ac   :)

Looking again, there is a check in configure.ac that attempts to disable the
pmdajson build if the python version is <=2.6 - it seems like that should've
protected us here...

Oh - I wonder if its the makefile ignoring this?  Can you check output from
rpm -qf /var/lib/pcp/pmda/json there Ken?  If its "pcp" & not "pcp-pmda-json"
then this all makes alot more sense, and we just need to tweak the makefile
for src/pmdas/json such that it honours PMDA_JSON from builddefs.

cheers.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>