| To: | nscott@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: pmnscomp and PMNS checksums |
| From: | Mark Goodwin <markgw@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 21 May 2008 17:58:16 +1000 |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1211180657.25294.446.camel@edge.scott.net.au> |
| Organization: | SGI Engineering |
| References: | <1211180657.25294.446.camel@edge.scott.net.au> |
| Reply-to: | markgw@xxxxxxx |
| Sender: | pcp-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.14 (Windows/20071210) |
|
Nathan Scott wrote: Hi,
Irrespective, we should nuke compiling the pmns and just deal with ascii. The binary format was introduced eons ago for performance reasons that are no longer relevant on modern h/w. Cheers |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | pcp updates, nscott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: pmnscomp and PMNS checksums, Max Matveev |
| Previous by Thread: | pmnscomp and PMNS checksums, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: pmnscomp and PMNS checksums, Max Matveev |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |