pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Oracle connection debugging (was Re: [pcp] Handling Oracle PMDA Late

To: Marko Myllynen <myllynen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Oracle connection debugging (was Re: [pcp] Handling Oracle PMDA Latencies)
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 02:26:26 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: pcp developers <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <594283644.49214956.1463982724891.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <56F25541.9020602@xxxxxxxxxx> <1558022602.42320984.1461208897951.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <57395F04.2090909@xxxxxxxxxx> <1695396289.47966126.1463381940778.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <573D897A.5070804@xxxxxxxxxx> <626822210.48972762.1463726815586.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <573EDF38.1020102@xxxxxxxxxx> <594283644.49214956.1463982724891.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: tvk36vJhQzBM2dco0EHtu5DtPmptWYR8fkSE
Thread-topic: Oracle connection debugging (was Re: [pcp] Handling Oracle PMDA Latencies)

----- Original Message -----
> ----- Original Message -----
> > On 2016-05-20 09:46, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > >> [...]
> > I think this is one of the larger setups tested so far. I mentioned that
> > e.g. for oracle.object_cache the select query returned over 220k rows
> > here, how many rows it returns on your test setup?
> 
> I no longer have access to the large system from the perf folk here.  But,
> on my laptop with a default Oracle install, there's ~8K rows there - when
> fetching that it takes 0.05 seconds (elapsed time).  So yep its definitely
> feasible that 220k will take ~1.3 seconds (approx linear).

(Oops, I mixed up the times from your earlier mail ... so, not linear)

>> - oracle.file takes ~1.3s with ~1k rows
>> - oracle.object_cache takes ~3.2s with ~225k rows

cheers.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>