pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: kmchart updates

To: nscott@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: kmchart updates
From: Mark Goodwin <markgw@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 14:13:16 +1000
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1190935880.15908.155.camel@edge.yarra.acx>
Organization: SGI Engineering
References: <45762.192.168.3.1.1190887138.squirrel@mail.aconex.com> <46FB8BB3.9040408@sgi.com> <1190935880.15908.155.camel@edge.yarra.acx>
Reply-to: markgw@xxxxxxx
Sender: pcp-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.13 (Windows/20070809)
I upgraded my FC7 to qt4-4.3.1-3 and kmchart builds fine now, thanks

-- Mark



Nathan Scott wrote:
On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 20:53 +1000, Mark Goodwin wrote:
Hi Nathan,


Hey Mark,

I've seen a lots of git commits for kmchart lately, so I thought I'd give
it a try.

Yeah, I've got a shopping list of known issues that I'm working through (see README) to get to a kmchart 1.0 release, where I'll make packages available (rpms and MacOSX packages planned).

First, cloned from your kmchart git tree and tried to build kmchart but
failed. Seems I need to set QMAKE in my env to /usr/lib/qt-3.3/bin/qmake
and add /usr/lib/qt-3.3/bin to my PATH. Then, following the instructions
in Docs/INSTALL:

No, I switched from QT3 recently, QT4 is required (they are completely different beasts, with little in the way of compatibility between the two APIs).

./Makepkgs verbose
...
I haven't spent much time on this, perhaps obviously :) I'm running FC7 in a VM on
my laptop, with qt and qt-dev installed. Do I need a newer version of QT?

Yep. Go for QT4.2 at least - I believe (from Kens laptop) that Fedora is up to QT4.3 now (they will have both QT4 and QT3 packages, since the two are so different). I switched to QT4 relatively recently, in order to get the Intel Mac support, better looking widgets on Linux (plus a host of other little benefits, like clear code from QtDesigner).

I also ended up creating a local QWT library and QMC library (based on
PMC) due to the plethora of build issues I had on my Mac (MacOSX has
this unusual "Framework" concept, which is "more than a shared lib",
and since Qt knows how to build these things, I took the local-copy
route.  This has the advantage now that the only build and runtime
dependency is QT4 (and PCP, of course).

cheers.





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>