pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: QA temporaries

To: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: QA temporaries
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 22:42:46 -0500 (EST)
Cc: PCP <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <002e01ceebdc$1ed2b160$5c781420$@internode.on.net>
References: <1626967316.19041413.1385589559423.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> <632473151.19046786.1385590121642.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> <002e01ceebdc$1ed2b160$5c781420$@internode.on.net>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: AQIHF8tGpGBS5VqrImQGasOgsLOPn5nJh4Eg5Fg06Zs=
Thread-topic: QA temporaries

----- Original Message -----
> Good idea ... $seq-$$ might be better just in case some bogan script is
> expecting $tmp.foo to expand to something with a single dot.

Done.

> We should extend this to adding "dodgey version from QA/$seq" comments to all
> the configuration files we replace during QA, for much the same reason.

*nod* - many seem to do this already, but likely there's some anti social
tests lurking around still.

thanks.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: QA temporaries, Nathan Scott <=