Re: [pcp] Regression for handling of ipc_prot=notready

[Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx>]

----- "Martin Hicks" <mort@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> I got a bug report today about a regression in pcp-2.9.2 and later
> that
> was introduced by commit 65ef4b08
> 
> Despite removing the text ipc protocol, we still have facilities for
> ipc_prot=notready, as documented in pmcd(1).  It looks like the fix
> is
> a small revert, although I've also added a comment:

Whoops - thanks!  Didn't realise a notready value could appear there too.

cheers.

-- 
Nathan