| To: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: PCP SourceForge |
| From: | Alan Hoyt <ahyt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 29 Nov 2005 23:27:12 -0500 |
| Cc: | mtw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx, markgw@xxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1133284173.26805.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| References: | <20050411093715.A15051@corp.theblr.com> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0504220823110.9546@kenj-pc.melbourne.sgi.com> <436A02CA.3020202@earthlink.net> <436ADFC1.4000403@earthlink.net> <1132774670.4368.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> <Pine.GSO.4.60.0511261419560.20979@corp.theblr.com> <1133185136.29186.26.camel@localhost.localdomain> <438BAA52.4030006@earthlink.net> <Pine.GSO.4.60.0511282234410.8650@corp.theblr.com> <1133284173.26805.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| Sender: | pcp-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) |
Ken McDonell wrote: On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 22:42 -0800, Michael Werner wrote:Deja vu – I’ve heard this a few times over the past few years. I am not sure what you mean by a "suitable gatekeeper" though. When you consider for example how much Oracle has changed from Oracle 7 (which I believe was the target of the Oracle pmda) to Oracle 10g today - a massive rewrite of the pmda is probably required rather than just having someone act as a “gatekeeper”. I would imagine the other database pmda’s are in a similar mode of decay thus substantially diminishing the value of these agents. So, I am not really clear what your expectations are ... unless you are offering up your expertise as the gatekeeper – if so, you can have the "pcpaddons" sourceforge site. I merely set it up to facilitate and share the two pcp efforts I am currently working on. Alan . |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: PCP SourceForge, Ken McDonell |
|---|---|
| Previous by Thread: | Re: PCP SourceForge, Ken McDonell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |