pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] PM_ERR_APPVERSION vs other errors

To: Scott Emery <emery@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] PM_ERR_APPVERSION vs other errors
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 16:07:09 +1000 (EST)
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <201009010359.o813xDHm539522@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
----- "Scott Emery" <emery@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> I'm nearly done with the initial list of comments for the Lustre
> PMDA.
> ...
> unexpected....   is it still appropriate to return PM_ERR_APPVERSION,
> or should I return something else?
> 
> PM_ERR_GENERIC is probably a trifle unfriendly,  I guess PM_ERR_VALUE
> would be the way to go?

If you get an unexpected version# in that file, I'd go with APPVERSION,
but if the format is unrecognisable, PM_ERR_VALUE sounds right to me.

cheers.

-- 
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [pcp] PM_ERR_APPVERSION vs other errors, Nathan Scott <=