pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: PCP 3.10.5

To: henry c <hc3249@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: PCP 3.10.5
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 20:42:18 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: pcp developers <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CABMF9curqYew-2LxTi=tOeCApOt-2160Je=b8ua28_e==ag5Qg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <CABMF9cuiUXe3Sss+ZUZn4oh1Stsp43u1G1ib_DQhZ58v1FimdA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <513687800.9959776.1430348643936.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <CABMF9cuiVbz83dHNMb2kyBUG=SBc8=hMtnH3=c52YwP=ONasaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1853303344.10742742.1430435378053.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <CABMF9curqYew-2LxTi=tOeCApOt-2160Je=b8ua28_e==ag5Qg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: +tQrDgQ6NGSIz1zEca21u1hZU3IiCw==
Thread-topic: PCP 3.10.5

----- Original Message -----
> Nathan,
> 
> Thanks for the response.
> 
> For me at least, the numbers are not matching.
> 

Oh, thats interesting - sounds a little like another issue I'm chasing
at the moment.  Does pminfo(1) give you the correct answer?

cheers.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>