Hi Marko,
----- Original Message -----
> Hi,
>
> On 2016-07-27 06:55, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> On July 24, 2016 at 9:03:16 PM, Nathan Scott (nathans@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> >>
> >>> It tends to be block devices and network interfaces that are problematic,
> >>> not CPUs FWIW - these are added and removed more commonly.
> >>
> >> We havenât started logging any nodes with this pmda, just starting to
> >> figure
> >> out what is useful, but whatever the final choice is, it would be ideal if
> >> pmlogger would automatically pickup any new devices. So if the pmlogger
>
> Great point, thanks for bringing it up.
>
> > Yes, this isn't going to work in the current code - we'll need to fix this.
>
> The current git code doesn't expose individual devices so there's
> nothing to fix there. What is needed is someone (tm) to implement an
> enhancement to expose those per-device metrics should they be deemed
> interesting/needed (which seems to be the case) in the most robust
> manner (which now is obvious: instead of dynamic metric names I
> initially proposed use instances).
+1
Sorry, I was confused by the per-interface networking metrics discussion, but
I see now those changes were not yet merged.
cheers.
--
Nathan
|