pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] initial pass at fixing zbxpcp.so for Zabbix v3

To: Marko Myllynen <myllynen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] initial pass at fixing zbxpcp.so for Zabbix v3
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 21:55:13 -0500 (EST)
Cc: pcp developers <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <56E02D53.2050102@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <675485289.27235420.1457066754101.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <56DD5312.2030004@xxxxxxxxxx> <889910044.28687035.1457397212945.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <56DEAF06.50801@xxxxxxxxxx> <262603004.28935441.1457477525468.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <56E02D53.2050102@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: 1nVXwQYr7xty5YnibIyMG07oiOGddg==
Thread-topic: initial pass at fixing zbxpcp.so for Zabbix v3

----- Original Message -----
> [...]
> > Ding, ding - here's round three, based on our IRC chat this morning - back
> > to earlier thoughts along the dlsym(3) line.  I'm assured it cannot fail,
> > so compile-tested only at this stage.
> 
> Yes, thanks a lot, it didn't fail, works out perfectly, tested
> zabbix-agent 2.4.7 and 3.0.0 on RHEL 7 using RPMs from Zabbix.
> (Symbol-wise 2.2 is the same as 2.4.)
> 

OK, lets go with that for now then (and punt on that symbol remaining forever).
Test qa/1067 already covers this change then -- so its got that going for it,
which is nice.

cheers.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>