| To: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates - nfs4 request metrics |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 7 Oct 2014 21:35:00 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <54339B80.5010607@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <54337DAE.6000107@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1851472641.62780119.1412664291586.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <54339B80.5010607@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Thread-index: | j7ziw/TyteFOqZbKW8zyt6Ug2L7vBA== |
| Thread-topic: | pcp updates - nfs4 request metrics |
----- Original Message ----- > [...] > but more telling is that the 59th member of the indom "[58] 59 reclaim_comp" > is not returned by pmFetch with no profile. > > kenj@vm08:~/src/pcp/qa$ src/torture_indom -v nfs4.server.reqs > number of instances from unprofiled fetch (58) != that for pmGetInDom (59) Yep, its a real bug in my recent changes - thanks!!! I've extended your earlier fix slightly, and added more QA testing to also verify the value at the final inst array element (via test-data-injection in qa/731). cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp-announce] PCP developers conference call - updated agenda, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | pcp updates: qa, bug fixes, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates - nfs4 request metrics, Ken McDonell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] qa/652 - systemd pmda, Ken McDonell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |