pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] pcp updates - nfs4 request metrics

To: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] pcp updates - nfs4 request metrics
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 21:35:00 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <54339B80.5010607@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <54337DAE.6000107@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1851472641.62780119.1412664291586.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <54339B80.5010607@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: j7ziw/TyteFOqZbKW8zyt6Ug2L7vBA==
Thread-topic: pcp updates - nfs4 request metrics

----- Original Message -----
> [...]
> but more telling is that the 59th member of the indom "[58] 59 reclaim_comp"
> is not returned by pmFetch with no profile.
> 
> kenj@vm08:~/src/pcp/qa$ src/torture_indom -v nfs4.server.reqs
> number of instances from unprofiled fetch (58) != that for pmGetInDom (59)

Yep, its a real bug in my recent changes - thanks!!!  I've extended your
earlier fix slightly, and added more QA testing to also verify the value
at the final inst array element (via test-data-injection in qa/731).

cheers.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>