| To: | Mark Goodwin <mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: python3 woes on f22 |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 14 Jul 2015 19:47:50 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20150714115711.GG22361@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <5594A1B5.5090003@xxxxxxxxxx> <y0mbnfhvx03.fsf@xxxxxxxx> <55A2FFBB.5000803@xxxxxxxxxx> <227885808.37023848.1436780775020.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <y0my4ikulyq.fsf@xxxxxxxx> <955515466.37555879.1436847748465.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <20150714115711.GG22361@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Thread-index: | kEWn6ZbjWuFvhOyPRLZQLBiVWodOyA== |
| Thread-topic: | python3 woes on f22 |
----- Original Message ----- > [...] > # this is a packaging decision (so dependencies can be declared & > # satisfied) rather than a sysadmin whim. This does not affect dependencies being declared and satisfied in any meaningful way - the argument is specious. We have had literally the *exact* same situation for many years with $PCP_AWK_PROG and its gawk package dependency. > So, with choice of python interpreter being a run-time alternative, > how do you intend to address dependencies? Same with everything else in pcp.conf, all of which are already "run- time alternatives". Of course the package dependencies must be met for the default values and that is all that's needed here. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: python3 woes on f22, Frank Ch. Eigler |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | QA build breakage for pcp-testsuite installs, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: python3 woes on f22, Frank Ch. Eigler |
| Next by Thread: | Re: python3 woes on f22, Frank Ch. Eigler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |