pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] Dynamic Proc PMDA metrics

To: Martins Innus <minnus@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] Dynamic Proc PMDA metrics
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 00:27:47 -0500 (EST)
Cc: pcp <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <54622BF4.4080806@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <545D2CFA.1050600@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1477043892.10880496.1415600819766.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <54622BF4.4080806@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: 3LhcAha3Es5NkDV+gmr9jrEY7kUMOA==
Thread-topic: Dynamic Proc PMDA metrics

----- Original Message -----
> [...]
> I think I'm ok with fixing everything but this.  I don't understand why

Great, thanks!

> it is failing. I put some debugging into the indom.c test and all
> queries into the proc pmda, even non-dynamic elements, return bogus
> information from pmLookupName:
> [...]
> My guess is that I'm not building the tree properly, but I'm not sure
> what is missing.

Odd - I'll look into it.  It may be something to do with the ordering of
PDUs (pmval and most tools will ask for pmdesc and other things - names/
pmids, etc before asking for instances) - IIRC this test program asks in
a different order, or only for instance PDUs, or something like that.

cheers.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>