Hi Marko,
----- Original Message -----
> > As discussed on IRC, I've changed it to make version detection dynamic
> > using a separate script, so that we avoid relying on the end-user doing
> > the configuration themselves. Lightly tested, will flesh out the QA if
> > you're thinking this approach still looks OK at this stage?
> [...]
>
> Zabbix Agent (daemon) v2.4.7 (revision 56694) (12 November 2015)
> Compilation time: Nov 13 2015 10:42:17
>
> zabbix_agentd (daemon) (Zabbix) 3.0.0
> Revision 58460 15 February 2016, compilation time: Feb 15 2016 16:15:24
/me shakes his head, wow
> - did you test this with Zabbix agent or by some other means? I'm seeing
Just tested the script, and only lightly (as mentioned) so as to not spend
too much time on code that's not likely to go anywhere. Turned out to be
a good idea...
Ding, ding - here's round three, based on our IRC chat this morning - back
to earlier thoughts along the dlsym(3) line. I'm assured it cannot fail,
so compile-tested only at this stage.
cheers.
--
Nathan
zabbix-dlopen.patch
Description: Text Data
|