| To: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] coding issues and defects uncovered by Coverity scans |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 13 Jan 2012 11:07:45 +1100 (EST) |
| Cc: | pcp <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Mark Goodwin <mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1326397809.1188.21.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
----- Original Message ----- > On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 21:50 +1100, Nathan Scott wrote: > > Hi Ken, > > ... > > OK, I've looked at a few more cases at random ... and there are enough > real issues here to warrant a quick pass and fix if obviously broken. > > We do need some global assignment of the 353 cases to avoid stepping > on > one another's toes. > > If I might suggest splitting by code area, I could start on the libpcp > ones. I've pushed most of what I had into a dev branch of my tree ... I have a half finished list of which of the issues this addresses, but have to run to a meeting - will get that to ya later today & we can divvy up further. cheers. -- Nathan |
| Previous by Date: | pcp updates, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] coding issues and defects uncovered by Coverity scans, Mark Goodwin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] coding issues and defects uncovered by Coverity scans, Ken McDonell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] coding issues and defects uncovered by Coverity scans, Mark Goodwin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |