pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: JSON PMDA with indom cache changes

To: David Smith <dsmith@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: JSON PMDA with indom cache changes
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 03:43:53 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: pcp <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1432466455.9615965.1433146915880.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <555DEF05.7030108@xxxxxxxxxx> <461406362.3814890.1432280874168.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <55677BB7.3060805@xxxxxxxxxx> <1432466455.9615965.1433146915880.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: gB4gStbDHpiU/J4yhdmSQ6OTOAEsVIvkhjEP
Thread-topic: JSON PMDA with indom cache changes
Hi David,

----- Original Message -----
> [...]
> Otherwise, looks good to me - just running a full QA run - will let you
> know if anything unexpected happens in the new tests.
> 

Minor issues - I pushed in fixes for 201 and 1053, but still seeing some
non-deterministic output from test 1052 (related to name hashing I guess);
its probably safe to arrange for the dbpmda output to be sorted?  See the
attached .bad file from the failing test.

cheers.

--
Nathan

Attachment: 1052.out.bad
Description: Binary data

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>