pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] NFS Server pmda

To: myllynen@xxxxxxxxxx, Paul Evans <pevans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] NFS Server pmda
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 04:43:11 -0500 (EST)
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <54D1CD57.80908@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <54CFAF63.1000200@xxxxxxxxxx> <2063280794.5937221.1422915037777.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <54D0E5A5.6040000@xxxxxxxxxx> <54D1CD57.80908@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: R07C8kHpuXbI3Y8VxLF3QXJJ1UG8oA==
Thread-topic: NFS Server pmda
Hi guys,

----- Original Message -----
> Hi,
> 
> On 2015-02-03 17:13, Paul Evans wrote:
> > On 02/02/15 22:10, Nathan Scott wrote:
> >> At first glance there would appear to be overlap with metrics from the
> >> Linux kernel PMDA - see the nfs.*, nfs3.*, nfs4.* and rpc.* metrics -
> >> are there some additional metrics added here that don't exist there?
> > Err, look like I missed that the nfs.*.reqs metrics had the different
> > request types as instances. Pretty much everything that was to be
> > added with nfsserver pmdas is already covered by the existing linux
> > kernel pmda.
> 
> yes, you're not the first one missing the fact, perhaps we should add a
> quick note somewhere about this?

*nod* - any ideas where it might go, that would be seen by someone going
down this path?  Maybe the issue is the existing metrics names not being
expressive enough?

cheers.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>