pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] [RFC] Minimizing Installation Size for Reduced PCP Footprint

To: Lukas Berk <lberk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] [RFC] Minimizing Installation Size for Reduced PCP Footprint
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 19:12:14 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <87pp6n7u7g.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <87bnk0wzn5.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx> <877ft59dmo.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx> <1344838118.4507317.1429675359315.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <87pp6n7u7g.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: 6it3qi5NNfKonZHxnkujN26uTOhwKg==
Thread-topic: Minimizing Installation Size for Reduced PCP Footprint
Hi Lukas,

----- Original Message -----
> [...]
> I've been toying with this idea a bit, and ended going with the two
> packages (pcp-collection and pcp-monitor, respectively).  If one is

Could we use the term "collector" rather than "collection"?  See e.g.
PCPIntro(1) - 3rd and 4th paragraphs there - that terminology is used
fairly extensively throughout the Users+Admins Guide book as well.

> interested in installing every pcp package, wildcarding "pcp-*" will
> work.

Neat - always the exceptions to the rule though I guess, with python* &
perl* module package naming conventions.

> I've pushed this commit to lberk/dev at sourceware.org/git/pcpfans.git
> 

Thanks Lukas.

cheers.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>