| To: | Lukas Berk <lberk@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] [RFC] Minimizing Installation Size for Reduced PCP Footprint |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 28 Apr 2015 19:12:14 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <87pp6n7u7g.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <87bnk0wzn5.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx> <877ft59dmo.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx> <1344838118.4507317.1429675359315.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <87pp6n7u7g.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Thread-index: | 6it3qi5NNfKonZHxnkujN26uTOhwKg== |
| Thread-topic: | Minimizing Installation Size for Reduced PCP Footprint |
Hi Lukas, ----- Original Message ----- > [...] > I've been toying with this idea a bit, and ended going with the two > packages (pcp-collection and pcp-monitor, respectively). If one is Could we use the term "collector" rather than "collection"? See e.g. PCPIntro(1) - 3rd and 4th paragraphs there - that terminology is used fairly extensively throughout the Users+Admins Guide book as well. > interested in installing every pcp package, wildcarding "pcp-*" will > work. Neat - always the exceptions to the rule though I guess, with python* & perl* module package naming conventions. > I've pushed this commit to lberk/dev at sourceware.org/git/pcpfans.git > Thanks Lukas. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] [RFC] Minimizing Installation Size for Reduced PCP Footprint, Ken McDonell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | pcp updates - mac os x fixes, Ken McDonell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFC] Minimizing Installation Size for Reduced PCP Footprint, Frank Ch. Eigler |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] [RFC] Minimizing Installation Size for Reduced PCP Footprint, Lukas Berk |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |