| To: | Marko Myllynen <myllynen@xxxxxxxxxx>, Mark Goodwin <mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] pmrep error on RHEL6.4 / python2.66 |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 16 Feb 2016 17:42:37 -0500 (EST) |
| Cc: | pcp <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <56C381C3.9050604@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <56BC2729.2060301@xxxxxxxxxx> <56C381C3.9050604@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Thread-index: | G6bDtKZHTsJpsMpezJfFhakWcnX1fA== |
| Thread-topic: | pmrep error on RHEL6.4 / python2.66 |
----- Original Message ----- > [...] > > > > This seems to be a common and known issue on such old python versions - > > is it worth doing something about it? (yes, definitely) > It depends - RHEL 6's Python 2.6 gained OrderedDict in RHEL 6.5: > PCP runs on many other platforms though, and it would be best to have pmrep available on all supported platforms (incl. EPEL5, but also many other non- Red Hat Linux distros, not to mention Mac OS X, *BSD and so on). > So if we're adjusting things for RHEL 6 I think perhaps we could > check whether OrderedDict is available but disabling pmrep altogether > sounds a step too far IMHO. Can we rearrange the code to not use an OrderedDict? (e.g switch to a regular dict, and arrange to have metrics sorted before displaying? - there is lots of other (needed?) use of OrderedDict's though so I'm not sure its that simple. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] Multi-archive Contexts: Some PCP Tools Lost in Time, Ken McDonell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] zbxpcp: add derived metrics support, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: pmrep error on RHEL6.4 / python2.66, Marko Myllynen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] pmrep error on RHEL6.4 / python2.66, Marko Myllynen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |