pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] new pmdamic

To: Martins Innus <minnus@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] new pmdamic
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 03:07:34 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <55CCEAA2.5070002@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <54FDC740.4040508@xxxxxxxxxxx> <595098997.2738114.1425963588057.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <5501F699.30008@xxxxxxxxxxx> <486671714.5180922.1426196106973.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <55084094.9080906@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1936903634.8326895.1426653349073.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <55CCEAA2.5070002@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: FUSA/wcX41N33FfFA2sgYntIAyKO4A==
Thread-topic: new pmdamic
Hi Martins,

----- Original Message -----
> [...]
> OK, finally getting back to cleaning up some of my outstanding work for
> submission.  I think I hit all of your comments.  I wasn't quite sure
> how to handle the packaging of the .python file in qa so I just copied
> the logic from qa/secure and it seems to work.  Let me know if you see
> any more issues.
> 
> https://github.com/ubccr/pcp/tree/micpmda
> 

Looks good to me & the qa packaging is how I would've approached it too.
Just doing a full testsuite run now and will merge it all in shortly.

cheers.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>