pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] çå: [patch] Add a new command pcp-ipcs

To: Marko Myllynen <myllynen@xxxxxxxxxx>, Liming Wu <wulm.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] çå: [patch] Add a new command pcp-ipcs
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 19:10:13 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <5759A3E7.8060507@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <6A799D6419DDBA43B657744DC4113882FE3F63B0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1615960628.52451231.1465196444123.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <6A799D6419DDBA43B657744DC4113882FE3F65C3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5759A3E7.8060507@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: t3MJcLUYH17PQMcwEIT3tmfKR0Eerw==
Thread-topic: Add a new command pcp-ipcs
Hi Marko,

----- Original Message -----
> Hi,
> 
> On 2016-06-06 12:30, Wu, Liming wrote:
> > 
> >> Nice work - it's great to see all the docs and QA work done too - thanks!
> 
> I now had a bit of time to check it and it's nice work indeed.
> 
> However, one minor question:
> 
> The pcp-ipcs(1) man page lists quite a few options which are not
> supported (and not shown in pcp ipcs --help output) as it is almost a
> 1:1 copy of the ipcs(1) man page, would it make sense to list all the
> unsupported options under the CONFORMING TO section? For some reason
> some are listed already (like -a and -b) but not all (e.g., -s and -q).
> 

Good idea.

>From chatting to Liming yesterday, it sounds like there is still further
work planned for pcp-ipcs (and pmdalinux, a number of the needed metrics
are missing), that may result in more/all of these options being fleshed
out.

cheers.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>