pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: pcp QA status

To: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: pcp QA status
From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 20:30:01 -0400
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <57688209.7030306@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <5767A046.3030207@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <y0mporbdedv.fsf@xxxxxxxx> <57688209.7030306@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
Hi, Ken -

> >Several of the pending patches on pcpfans.git fche/pmfuntools (nee
> >fche/multithread) were written 5-7 weeks ago to improve this.
> 
> Thanks for the pointer Frank.  These commits have been merged now (based 
> on a quick inspection of the commit history in the two trees) and on the 
> one machine I've tried, qa/666 has passed 3/3 attempts ... so that's 
> very encouraging.

Thanks!

> As one who spends more time debugging other people's qa tests than
> anyone else (which is not related to 666 but is a more general
> statement), it is however a bit perplexing that 666 runs for more
> than five minutes [...]

Yeah; it's more asynchronous and its child pm$client processes have
run times that are too variable to be able to do at least a few
iteration rounds within a much smaller fixed timeframe.

- FChE

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>