Re: Simple fix needed, not docs? (was Re: [pcp] RFC2: fetchgroup api)

["Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi -

> [...]
> > > That seems too easy [...]
> > I hope it is, good luck!
> That's not a very helpful attitude really.

I'm confused.

On one hand, you describe the work as "too easy", "surely [I]'d simply
have fixed that", trivializing the scope of the work.

On the other hand, you describe my not jumping at it as "not a very
helpful attitude", as though it was a nontrivial scope of work.
(After all, if it is trivial, then doing it is not that "helpful".)


> Could you take a break from the feature work and help out? - fix the
> crash, write a small QA test?  Beats documentation littered with
> references to bugzilla entries, hands down.

I might say I would consider it, were I not concerned about it turning
into a reoccurrance of the disgraceful PR1105 situation.


- FChE