pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] Thin Provisioning (dm-thin) PMDA

To: Max Matveev <makc@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] Thin Provisioning (dm-thin) PMDA
From: Michele Baldessari <michele@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 10:29:59 +0100
Cc: Paul Evans <pevans@xxxxxxxxxx>, pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=acksyn.org; h= user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type :content-type:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:subject :from:from:date:date:received:received; s=2010; t=1427189401; bh=03kSIPV9ATHvjaLWIwpJ21ITXYlARj/C5kv3tTSy+r0=; b=BqsdjXSr0D+q M7qnOpmlE9ra+0e5uYdSXYiMwtQrwmg8FyXMImz4B35hN1ydehUxX56z2NUQPOQ5 X8cXwqApPl3V2Qjp7FJD9FVjm/PiwCo76Zu7mdryyCI4PBSSJhxlLWGooXiBINbs /iAG33sXpMP3T4Hx0mTK1vpGd1kwHF8=
In-reply-to: <21777.2334.742173.970827@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <550C5914.20104@xxxxxxxxxx> <21777.2334.742173.970827@xxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1-rc1 (2014-03-12)
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:50:06PM -0700, Max Matveev wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 17:29:56 +0000, Paul Evans wrote:
> 
>  PE> I have been working towards adding coverage for thin-provisioning 
> (dm-thin)
>  PE> to PCP to compliment the already existing dm-cache coverage.
> 
> Can this be folded in to one DM pmda or even better into linux PMDA?
> I'm just worried about PMDA prolifieration.

+1

I think having a single DM pmda covering most DM-related collection
would be preferable and simpler for most sysadmins

cheers,
Michele
-- 
Michele Baldessari            <michele@xxxxxxxxxx>
C2A5 9DA3 9961 4FFB E01B  D0BC DDD4 DCCB 7515 5C6D

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>