Hi -
> > > 828 and 833 are new failures from overnight commits - they look
> > > likely to be just .out file issues [...]
Yes, sorry. Both new .out.bad files should become .out. (And I
could've sworn in one of my too-many rebases the 828 one was already
accounted for.)
> I mainly just want to make sure all bases were covered and since it
> touches some of the most critical code paths in all PCP (potentially
> regressing single-threaded performance, etc) that those questions were
> fully addressed.
> e.g. is live mode affected positively / negatively?
As per the other note, very slightly positively. Memory consumption
should be slightly smaller (since buffers are neither
retained-after-free nor artificially enlarged). Since live mode is
nowhere near cpu-bound, it's a hard phenomenon to measure.
> how much of those reported times was I/O time - are we CPU bound yet
> with warm cache?
With pmwebd or such bulk processing, it was all cpu-bound, so
representing the worst case scenario.
> were the reported numbers warm/cold cached archives,
With the pmwebd bulk numbers, warm caches.
- FChE
|