| To: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Containers analysis with PCP |
| From: | "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 9 Feb 2015 21:34:10 -0500 |
| Cc: | PCP <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1602407544.1781133.1423528333125.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <2100915892.5240937.1422867358164.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <768474811.5242777.1422867576642.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <y0m7fvr3tem.fsf@xxxxxxxx> <1602407544.1781133.1423528333125.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.2i |
Hi - > > Please don't forget to address earlier review comments in [1]. > > The review was ~2 weeks out of date when sent & the one/two issues there > were fixed already, independently. It would have been helpful to note this contemporaneously. > I see nothing needing further action there. Please check closer. Nothing appears to have changed about container naming policy or mechanism (pmdas still store it as char*'s, resolution still done repeatedly and ambiguously), which represented the bulk of the concern. > Feel free to revisit & reassess with current code (objectively, > please - patches and QA tests will help you more than opinions about > design docs) (The absence of design docs/discussion is an objective fact.) - FChE |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] Containers analysis with PCP, Mark Goodwin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Containers analysis with PCP, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Containers analysis with PCP, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Containers analysis with PCP, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |