Re: PCP trees for web and middleware development

["Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi -

mgoodwin wrote:

> I've not had time to fully understand the issues being debated here,

I'll try to summarize succinctly in a separate message.


> [...] AFAICT, the "1000's of lines of C++ and javascript and
> associated images" are in effect a 3rd party library package, and
> thus belong in a separate tree and should ship in a separate
> package. [...]

(Note that there is no C++ in the third-party programs.  They are
just dead data files - web assets - and they are not build- or
install-dependencies of PCP / pmwebd.  They just complete the user
experience.)


- FChE