| To: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: pmlogger -u questions |
| From: | "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 14 Apr 2014 17:25:51 -0400 |
| Cc: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>, pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <534C4FF4.5000304@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <01e901cf56df$4ce97de0$e6bc79a0$@internode.on.net> <1665962954.4723287.1397437104781.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <534B4330.1060008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <y0meh104nvl.fsf@xxxxxxxx> <534C4FF4.5000304@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.2i |
Hi - On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 07:15:32AM +1000, Ken McDonell wrote: > [...] Can we agree that -u semantics and no stdio should be the > default behaviour going forward? [...] That would make sense to me (leaving room for future O_SYNC and/or fsync(2) at related times). - FChE |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: pmlogger -u questions, Ken McDonell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: pmlogger -u questions, Ken McDonell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: pmlogger -u questions, Ken McDonell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: pmlogger -u questions, Ken McDonell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |