| To: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] Comments regarding pcp_3.8.2_i386.changes |
| From: | Paul Tagliamonte <paultag@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 13 Aug 2013 09:26:36 -0400 |
| Cc: | Paul Richards Tagliamonte <ftpmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, PCP Development Team <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=g0d9mLp2vpqTyXEO5s9s5Wx3RhNnc7LuwcaoHPyrM+s=; b=0/3ts8aMVooqqjvmW2C0ZItZmj5ke7cemtWqU7vm1P0Xu5uklEwSRsdJAa4cUBV4qQ d0Arh9Rkjk3c17CYrJ+++pDMECpYSR2bNvQGzLmupP1o3VupJJX60KgwJdBMtUoeB/YA lQuA46J2s29sr2EJGm5GvPaaer1oU5tSyUtW9HHKWyUKdNW1J2d4zokuqJqPRdktBSJH NwxSPqeG6e4JQQpduX3dIql4rU1MmryzNcXW1mQn7VD130GlyiKTuM6+GUEjHBGsun8K QrmHIyD10DaZuYJDsx/gGpyg0W/vyJdlBMR5oTXqTHa2aHzezeLXtsP10KaqPYNw95cp 8L1A== |
| In-reply-to: | <20194947.1325677.1376368906417.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <E1V53Zd-0003Zr-Cn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1059109519.8868569.1375410869085.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> <20194947.1325677.1376368906417.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | "Paul R. Tagliamonte" <paultag@xxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 12:41:46AM -0400, Nathan Scott wrote: > Hi there Paul (and/or other deb ftp-masters), > > ----- Original Message ----- > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > Howdy, > > > > > > Can you please confirm the licensing of > > > > > > pcp-3.8.2\qa\src\torture_pmns.c > > > > > > > These are test programs (everything below qa), and we tend to try > > keep those simple, short and to the point - they are all covered > > by the top-level COPYING file however, which states: > > ... > > Didn't hear back from you on this one, and the 3.8.2 update seems > to be possibly stalled ... can you let us know where things stand? Erm, sorry. I've been stuck out in the woods for a few days, so my usual Debian time was a bit lacking the last little while. I think what you explained does not raise any red flags for me right now - I'll review it again promptly. > pcp-3.8.2 was a couple of weeks ago, but more troublesome from our > point of view, 3.8.1 also added a sub-package and it also stalled > (still hasn't appeared in unstable ... since mid-June). It is the > nature of the PCP architecture that more sub-packages are likely > to appear (3.8.3 adds Infiniband instrumentation as a sub-package), > so if there's things we can do at our end to simplify the process, > please let us know. Many thanks! I'll see what I can do to process it quickly. Sorry! > > cheers. > > -- > Nathan Cheers, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte <paultag@xxxxxxxxxx> : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: pcp updates: pmcd clients use "local:" as the default instead of gethostname() or localhost, Frank Ch. Eigler |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | proc pmda and QA question, Ken McDonell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] Comments regarding pcp_3.8.2_i386.changes, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] Comments regarding pcp_3.8.2_i386.changes, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |