| To: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: pmcd.openfds Metric (was: [pcp] NSS/NSPR Testing Status) |
| From: | "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 3 Dec 2012 16:21:50 -0500 |
| Cc: | Dave Brolley <brolley@xxxxxxxxxx>, Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>, pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1354482125.15639.14.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <591870624.35407484.1354151497586.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> <50B8DB53.20500@xxxxxxxxxx> <1354482125.15639.14.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.2i |
Hi - On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 08:02:05AM +1100, Ken McDonell wrote: > [...] > As far as I can recall (which is not far when you get to my age), the > original motivation for this was to _cheaply_ collect a metric that > would detect an obscure file descriptor leak problem. > [...] > I don't think iteration with dup() meets the "cheap" requirement. It's not cheap, but it is thorough. :) > So provided you have closure of all the places open() and friends are > called (as the current code does) [...] Do we really? Third-party PMDA DSO's are unknown, and so may be some of the fd operations used by various libraries our own DSO's link in (e.g. the new systemd one! :-). - FChE |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | pcp updates - qa, Ken McDonell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: More cleverer QA config needed? (was Re: [pcp] NSS/NSPR Testing Status), Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: pmcd.openfds Metric (was: [pcp] NSS/NSPR Testing Status), Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: pmcd.openfds Metric (was: [pcp] NSS/NSPR Testing Status), Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |